Digital evidence review. Human expertise. Explore our approach ↗
Interface Forensics
About Interface Forensics

Built for a world
where pixels lie.

Interface Forensics is a digital evidence analysis firm specializing in detecting manipulated, fabricated, and AI-generated visual evidence. We combine forensic design expertise with a systematic, evidence-based methodology for businesses and legal teams.

Work with us ↗Explore pricing →
Our background

Design and engineering expertise,
applied to evidence.

An anomaly raises a question. A finding explains what it means.

Our reviewers bring design and engineering experience from complex financial products and workflows. Designers notice the details people rarely consciously see: baseline alignment, grid systems, responsive behavior, localization and product-specific patterns.

When an image is altered, those patterns can stop behaving like a system. We look for the seams, then test what they mean against the available context.

Who evaluates the evidence

Evidence evaluated by design and engineering leaders of complex financial products.

Experience

45 years of combined experience in interface composition.

Education

Academic backgrounds in design, engineering, and computer science.

Practice

Trained public speakers who make complex information easy to understand.

Human judgment

Technology supports the examination.
People interpret the evidence.

Visual systems

Typography, alignment, component geometry, spacing, colors, icons and rendering consistency.

Content & context

Dates, currencies, application conventions and whether related evidence tells a consistent story.

Technical indicators

Image properties, compression, available metadata and other indicators relevant to the review.

Our examination framework

12 points of examination

A structured examination across file, interface, and contextual evidence.

  1. 1

    Artifact & File Characteristics

  2. 2

    Device & Platform Environment

  3. 3

    Typography

  4. 4

    Geometry & Layout

  5. 5

    Color & Rendering

  6. 6

    Logos, Icons & Assets

  7. 7

    Formatting & Microcopy

  8. 8

    Interface State & Product Logic

  9. 9

    Mathematical & Data Consistency

  10. 10

    Pixel-Level Manipulation Signals

  11. 11

    Temporal & Version Consistency

  12. 12

    Cross-Artifact Consistency

Examination scope depends on the supplied evidence and available references. Not every check applies to every artifact.

Our principles

Preservation & escalation

Keep originals intact. Where source records, devices or server data are needed, we identify that limitation.

Evidence beats intuition

Conclusions should connect to observable findings, with the reasoning made understandable.

Neutrality over outcomes

We do not begin with a verdict. The review may identify indicators, find none, or remain inconclusive.

A closer look. A clearer decision.

The tools for creating evidence have changed.
Its scrutiny should too.

Get Started ↗