Pre-submission review
Evaluate client-provided screenshots before relying on them.
A payment. A conversation. A timeline. What a screenshot appears to show can differ from what it can establish. We examine the artifact and available references so counsel can decide what to corroborate, challenge, or investigate next.
Evaluate client-provided screenshots before relying on them.
Identify specific anomalies that may merit a question, challenge or discovery request.
Translate interface details into understandable findings. Formal expert support requires a separately agreed scope and qualified availability.
We examine the supplied artifact and its consistency with available references. Healthcare image review concerns the evidence itself; it does not provide a clinical interpretation.
A structured framework of 12 examination points helps us test observations against available references.
Explore the 12 points of examination →Typography, alignment, component geometry, spacing, colors, icons and rendering consistency.
An anomaly raises a question. A finding explains what it means.
This check does not apply to the supplied evidence.
No meaningful inconsistency identified within scope. Consider the rest of the evidence; this does not guarantee authenticity.
These are check-level statuses. The final evaluation brings the relevant findings together. No indicators detected does not guarantee authenticity; indicators alone do not establish fraud.